Re: [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- From: "Kinon O'Cann" <somewhere@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:59:05 -0500
"Paul Furman" <paul-@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:CxQMf.17339$2O6.8203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My Sigma 12-24 has the most hideous bokeh around. But yeah, I never see it
unless I try. Yours looks fine to me, light-years smoother than the 12-24.
The Sigma fisheye is my first Sigma product in decades. I had sworn them
off, but have read some very good things about some of their lenses, so I
thought I'd take a chance. So far, it's a nice lens.
Titles. Hmmm..... OK, when my camera comes back from Canon service, and I
can shoot some more, I'll do a better job with titles. Grainy B&W may have
helped, too.
For now, it's the Yashica Mat 124G, and nothing else.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- From: Ken Nadvornick
- Re: [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- References:
- [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- From: Alan Browne
- Re: [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- From: Kinon O'cann
- Re: [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- From: Paul Furman
- [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- Prev by Date: Re: Scanned 35mm Provia Film.......Resolution?
- Next by Date: Re: Replies to Portrait lens for the 20D
- Previous by thread: Re: [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- Next by thread: Re: [SI] bokeh - Alan's comments
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|