Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: "MarkČ" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net>
- Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:35:06 -0800
William Graham wrote:
"Mark²" <mjmorgan(lowest even number here)@cox..net> wrote in message
news:gfCFf.55700$V.26404@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Robert C. wrote:Well, as newer and better dyes are created, we can go to the store
"Scott W" <biphoto@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1139188520.706556.128420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Chris Loffredo wrote:
About 10% of the CD-Rs I burned 5 years ago are unreadable or haveAbout 98% of the CD-Rs I burned 7 years ago are find, I know the
serious defects.
ones there were going bad and have saved everything that was on
those few.
I friend of mine who works for a telecomunications company has told
me that they have noticed an interesting trend: data storage on CD's
seem to "fade" from some discs and not from others. He says their IT
is unsure if it is due to the discs themselves, the burners, or
something else. Their theory is that the pits burned by the laser
might not be deep enough in the plastic, and with time the plastic
fills into the void erasing the signal.
Just relaying the information: "Don't shoot the messenger."
It's a dye thing...not a plastic thing...
and buy the new blanks, and then bring them home and duplicate our
older disks onto them, and for a couple of dollars a disk, we can
extend our archival lifetimes into the distant future......
I generally agree with that.
-But there a part of the issue that I think remains a significant
problem...that being those long-forgotten family "finds..."
-Like the huge box of slides I found a few years ago, shot by my long-gone
grandfather.
Nobody even knew he had these boxes, and the boxes hadn't been been touched
in over 50 years.
-Had these been on disks, it is almost certain that they would be
unreadable...either because the format was long since replaced (meaning no
way to read them), or the data was bad.
It is these sort of scenarios where I DO think digital will be a problem.
Most families don't have acting, digital, "museum custodians" who always
maintain everyone's files.
Nobody had to "mainain" those boxes of slides... They just had to be
discovered by me.
Don't get me wrong... I think there are advantages to digital in terms of
the *ability* to keep perfect originals in more than one place, etc., but
there are scenarios where digital could have a shortened life--perhaps
simply due to death, or secrecy of existence...or ignorance regarding proper
maintenance at any point/generation in the future.
-Mark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: William Graham
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- References:
- The end of photography (again)
- From: Robert Feinman
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: Scott W
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: Chris Loffredo
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: Scott W
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: Robert C.
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: MarkČ
- Re: The end of photography (again)
- From: William Graham
- The end of photography (again)
- Prev by Date: Re: A letter to the CEO of Pentax Corporation
- Next by Date: Re: Canon domination?
- Previous by thread: Re: The end of photography (again)
- Next by thread: Re: The end of photography (again)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|