Re: Which if these looks better?
- From: DD <roxy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:24:53 +0200
In article <Th6af.1371$Gy5.666@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
duncanjamesmurray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
> "David Littlewood" <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:7kwIRuFlYJaDFwyS@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > In article <MPG.1dd2a5e46a9f61f398985e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, DD
> > <roxy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes
> >>http://www.leica.co.za/photos/M3_October_12_mod.jpg
> >>http://www.leica.co.za/photos/M3_October_12_modBW.jpg
>
> Prefer tone of B&W, but like the colour.
>
> Ideally the colour one, but with tone adjusted to make it darker and more
> contrasty.
Thanks for the input. Actually it has been radically altered by
overlaying a second layer in multiply mode, which made it a lot better
than the original. I will try to play with it some more.
--
DD
www.dallasdahms.com
Central Scrutinizer
.
- References:
- Which if these looks better?
- From: DD
- Re: Which if these looks better?
- From: David Littlewood
- Re: Which if these looks better?
- From: Duncan J Murray
- Which if these looks better?
- Prev by Date: Re: Nikonos V - Problems with first efforts
- Next by Date: Re: Which if these looks better?
- Previous by thread: Re: Which if these looks better?
- Next by thread: Re: Which if these looks better?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|