Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: Bill Tuthill <can@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Oct 2005 16:37:45 -0700
Philip Homburg <philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Although I can understand the attraction of full frame 35mm digital SLRs,
> it strikes me as odd that all people (or even a significant fraction) who
> are now using film are just waiting for a full frame 35mm DSLR.
I don't like to spend money unnecessarily, and my feeling is that
partial-frame DSLRs are money badly spent, unless you really need one
for business reasons. Partial-frame DSLR lenses, especially overpriced
ones like the Canon 17-85, are money even more badly spent. The 17-85
costs more than twice as much as a Canon 28-135, isn't as good optically,
and will probably have a very short useful lifespan.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: Philip Homburg
- Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: ian lincoln
- Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- References:
- Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: chrisplatt@xxxxxxx
- Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: Martin Riddle
- Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: Gordon Moat
- Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: Bill Tuthill
- Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- From: Philip Homburg
- Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- Prev by Date: Re: Death Knoll of Film Delayed?
- Next by Date: Re: ANNI'S PRO DEBUT !!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- Next by thread: Re: Might be the end of the line for Agfa Photo
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|