Re: film truly is dead
- From: "Beach Bum" <e.cartman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:10:44 GMT
"kz8rt3" <kz8rt3@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kz8rt3-6691FF.17035226082005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In article <YuJPe.63987$Yx1.35143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Beach Bum" <e.cartman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > I thought about getting a 35mm SLR, but now I think I will save more
on
> > > development costs than I will pay for the DSLR.
> >
> > Well that is true for sure. I've spend over $900 on color film
development
> > this year alone and I shoot 70% black & white. I've fixed the problem
by
> > purchasing a Canon 20D.
>
> Is that what photography has come down to? A matter of cost?
>
> Yes, focus on the bottom line. That always ends up better. Sheesh.
Yeah, I'm focusing on the bottom line by purchasing a $1,300 camera with
$500 worth of accessories and a $750 lens.
What it comes down to is I like to develop my own black & white, but I'm
tired of paying someone else to develop the color. It's still going to cost
me upwards of $10 a print from digital.
So, no, it's not about bottom line, it's about work flow, hassle and keeping
some of the money in my pocket so I can afford other things like road trips,
lenses, and framing materials.
Sheesh. :)
--
Mark
Photos, Ideas & Opinions
http://www.marklauter.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: film truly is dead
- From: kz8rt3
- Re: film truly is dead
- References:
- film truly is dead
- From: Mr.Happy
- Re: film truly is dead
- From: Beach Bum
- Re: film truly is dead
- From: kz8rt3
- film truly is dead
- Prev by Date: Re: film truly is dead
- Next by Date: Re: [SI] Local Geography - Brian's comments
- Previous by thread: Re: film truly is dead
- Next by thread: Re: film truly is dead
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|