Re: Good semi-pro camera?
- From: Alan Browne <alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 19:25:47 -0400
Archibald wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:37:29 -0400, Alan Browne
<alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To reach high pixel counts with less noise, FF is the way to go. For that matter, when used prices are in line I'll get a back for my Hasselblad...
By the time the Hasselblad backs come down to a reasonable price, the
16x22mm sensor DSLRs will surpass them in performance... maybe already
have.
Except when you consider that 'noise' thing.
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
-- usenet posts from gmail.com and googlemail.com are filtered out.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: 35mm film VS digital
- Next by Date: Re: Night sky on Long Island
- Previous by thread: Re: Good semi-pro camera?
- Next by thread: Re: Good semi-pro camera?
- Index(es):