Re: Canon vs Nikon - Which One
- From: measekite <inkystinky@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 07:40:26 -0700
Böwser wrote:
"measekite" <inkystinky@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:Qymtk.19164$cW3.18191@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxWe all know that the Digital Rebel XSi has an edge on the very fine Nikon D60.
It does?
And the Nikon D300 (for a big wad of cash) has an edge on the Canon 40D.
Yes, and it's more expensive, as well, as you say.
And nobody knows how th3 Nikon D700 will compare against the Canon 5DMKII (or whatever they will call it)
Based on the quantity of rumors that existed prior to each release, the edge goes to the 5D II. (....sigh....)
But how do you think the new Nikon D90 Will share out against the Canon 50D.
All I can tell right now is that the D90 is a little smaller. I think we need to see if Canon's 'gapless microlens' technology really can help. If it does, well... Let's wait for the test images.
And how will the new Canon 18-200 compare agaqinst Nikon 18-200.
Both will suck. Nikon's may suck a little less since it's an AF-S lens, and the Canon uses a micromotor for focusing (geez, why?). But I believe suckitude will reign here.
Why do you think these lenses suck? If true why can't they make a good one at a reasonable price.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: 35mm film VS digital
- Next by Date: Re: Google and blogspot.com copyright infrigement
- Previous by thread: Re: Canon vs Nikon - Which One
- Next by thread: Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Watches: Quality Omega Discount Watches
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
