Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- From: "Jack Torrence" <room217[at]overlook.freeserve.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:26:56 +0100
"Fred" <fredapain@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:48abfa2a$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Jack Torrence" <room217[at]overlook.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:48abc5ab$1_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"measekite" <inkystinky@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:kQBqk.19695$89.17523@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jack Torrence wrote:
"measekite" <inkystinky@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:0elqk.36943$ZE5.17072@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ken wrote:
I have just given away my Panasonic FZ18 to my son as I was not takingIn that size I would take a look at the various Canons, Reviews say the
it
out with me. So am looking at the TZ range, which will go in my
pocket, but
am confused as all three are on sale and the TZ3 seems very good but
should
I pay more and go for the TZ5. Why is it significantly more expensive?
Then
there is the TZ4????????????
Ken
color quality and basic image quality is better. Panasonic either has
more noise or does more processing and that spoils the end result.
If you do not need an optical viewfinder take a look at the SD990. It
has been claimed to have the best 3" LCD that is viewable in bright
daylight. I have not seen this but it was claimed in the reviews.
Well done for completely ignoring the OP's question and suggesting a
camera that doesn't even come anywhere close to having the features of
the Pana TZ range.
Features are nice but they take a back seat to the ultimate reason for
purchasing a camera. And that is picture quality. That is really where
it is at. If you want the best picture quality you may have to give up
some features unless without those features you would not get any photo
at all.
You prat. So to take wildlife pictures you'd chose a fixed focal length
camera over a 400mm zoom lens, if it produced better 'quality' pictures?
PS. Don't forget to recommend the use of genuine canon ink to print those
pics from the SD900.
If I may iterject in this argument :)
Just to redress the balance a bit, I've got various makes of "prosumer" P&S
digital cameras, including Panasonic and Canon, and while my Panasonic FZ5
has a superb Leica zoom lens, IS and many other great features, it without
doubt produces by far the worst images of any of my cameras, when viewed at
100% on the screen, even the ISO 100 pictures are poor compared to my other
cameras. So yes Panasonic cameras are technically brilliant with great
features, but when it comes down to it, their pictures aren't on a par with
the best of the bunch. This isn't to say that I don't like my FZ5, it still
gets used a lot because of the excellent zoom range, but it's only any good
in brightly lit situations, and the pictures certainly aren't good enough to
stand up to much post processing.
Fred, the average buyer of a TZ3,4,5 are not likely to print anything bigger than A4 so it's not especially relevant what it looks like on the screen at 100%. This is afterall a point and shoot camera. I believe the TZ4 & 5 are a considerable improvement over your FZ5 wrt noise, but will still be outdone by a lot of other makes (especially canon) wrt image quality. However, I suspect people who consider the TZ range are doing so because of the lens and no other maker comes close on a pocketable point and shoot, so if thats the criteria then a slightly lower image quality is a compromise that most are probably willing to accept.
.
- References:
- Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- From: Ken
- Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- From: measekite
- Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- From: Jack Torrence
- Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- From: measekite
- Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- From: Jack Torrence
- Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- Prev by Date: Re: Samsung S760: battery life
- Next by Date: Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- Previous by thread: Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- Next by thread: Re: Panasonic TZ3, TZ4 or TZ5
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading