Re: Unfortunate for P&S

From: -hh <recscuba_google@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:03:40 -0700 (PDT)

measekite <inkysti...@xxxxxxx> wrote:

How many readers in this ng would find the
lack of a viewfinder in a P&S a negative?

I do. For the most part, I'm looking for three primary attributes
when looking for a P&S:

1) Uses AA batteries

2) Has an optical viewfinder

3) Has its LCD display on a fold-out/over arm assembly
(useful for "ant view" macro, etc)

Of course, it would also be nice to have the media be CF, but it
appears that that battle's been lost for 2 years now in P&S's.

-hh
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unfortunate for P&S
  - From: James Silverton

References:
- Unfortunate for P&S
  - From: measekite

Prev by Date: Re: Equivalent of "opening 1 or more stop" in post processing?
Next by Date: Re: Unfortunate for P&S
Previous by thread: Re: Unfortunate for P&S
Next by thread: Re: Unfortunate for P&S
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Unfortunate for P&S
... lack of a viewfinder in a P&S a negative? ... Of course, it would also be nice to have the media be CF, but it ... appears that that battle's been lost for 2 years now in P&S's. ... John Turco ...
(rec.photo.digital)
Re: Unfortunate for P&S
... Ron Hunter wrote: ... lack of a viewfinder in a P&S a negative? ... Of course, it would also be nice to have the media be CF, but it ... appears that that battle's been lost for 2 years now in P&S's. ...
(rec.photo.digital)