Re: Macro mode
- From: ASAAR <caught@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:06:05 -0400
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 15:10:07 -0400, Neil Harrington wrote:
As a practical matter it isn't really the lens to focal plane magnification
ratio that matters, it's the final image size. So in a sense you're right,
the compact camera's smaller sensor has the advantage that it can achieve
the same final image size with a smaller in-camera magnification, since more
magnification is necessarily applied *after* the on-sensor magnification.
Have view cameras (using say, 8"x10" plates) been used to take
larger than life images, such as for a portrait of a baby's face or
pictures of other objects of similar size? If so, were contact size
prints called macro photos?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Macro mode
- From: Neil Harrington
- Re: Macro mode
- From: Peter Irwin
- Re: Macro mode
- References:
- Macro mode
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: Macro mode
- From: David J Taylor
- Re: Macro mode
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: Macro mode
- From: David J Taylor
- Re: Macro mode
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: Macro mode
- From: Neil Harrington
- Macro mode
- Prev by Date: Re: affordable digital cameras in LA/SF?
- Next by Date: Re: focus, then change focal length
- Previous by thread: Re: Macro mode
- Next by thread: Re: Macro mode
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|