Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Marc Wossner <marc.wossner@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 09:53:17 -0700 (PDT)
On 25 Mai, 18:04, Kennedy McEwen <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <87abiexzpb....@xxxxxxxxxx>, Floyd L. Davidson
<fl...@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
Kennedy McEwen <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <87abifz5dw....@xxxxxxxxxx>, Floyd L. Davidson
<fl...@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
Kennedy McEwen <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <87skw7zre6....@xxxxxxxxxx>, Floyd L. Davidson
<fl...@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
Kennedy McEwen <r...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <873aoa3ve1....@xxxxxxxxxx>, Floyd L. Davidson
<fl...@xxxxxxxxxx> writes
ransley <Mark_Rans...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On May 22, 5:28 am, Marc Wossner <marc.woss...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
SNR = 20 log (Signal RMS / Noise RMS)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^dB has no particular attachment to sound, any more than
it does to light. It's a ratio of two numbers, as shown
in the formula above. The numbers represent signal
power, regardless of what the signal actually is.
Read what I wrote very carefully Kennedy; it should be
very apparent that right from the start I know exactly
what you are referring to.
I have, and I think you will realise that, from the start I have
considered what you wrote to be ambiguous at best or indeed, if your
words are interpreted in a logical manner but not necessarily the manner
you meant, completely wrong.
"Its a ratio of two numbers" followed by "the numbers" (ie. the SAME
numbers) "represent signal power, regardless..."
That is completely wrong. "The numbers" do NOT represent signal power,
they are voltages. The ratio (signal / noise) is a VOLTAGE ratio.
A decibel is a power ratio, by definition.
The DECIBEL is, but NOT the ratio of the numbers you referred to.
The ratio (signal^2 / noise^2) IS a power ratio,
End of discussion.
...
It is a *power* ratio. That is true regardless of what
the two numbers actually represent.
No it isn't!
It is a power ratio by definition.
Only if you follow the definition. If you don't, such as by using
numbers without regard to their meaning, exactly as you suggested, then
you are not following the definition and therefore end up with something
that is NOT a power ratio.
--
Kennedy
Yes, Socrates himself is particularly missed;
A lovely little thinker, but a bugger when he's pissed.
Python Philosophers (replace 'nospam' with 'kennedym' when replying)
As this highly theoretical discussion is not so easy to follow for me,
I´d like to bring it back to something that I can work with: If I
chose the numerator of snr to be the range available in the image
file -256 for 8-bit or 4096 for 12-bit - and the denominator to be
the standard deviation as the equivalent to RMS noise, is the form SNR
= 20 log (Signal RMS / Noise RMS) correct or should it be SNR = 10 log
(Signal RMS / Noise RMS)?
Best regards!
Marc Wossner
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Ilya Zakharevich
- Re: Calculation of snr
- References:
- Calculation of snr
- From: Marc Wossner
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: ransley
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: Calculation of snr
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Calculation of snr
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions, digitals from $200 to $300?
- Next by Date: Re: Questions, digitals from $200 to $300?
- Previous by thread: Re: Calculation of snr
- Next by thread: Re: Calculation of snr
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|