Re: Who care really if the D3 is better/worse than some Canon model?
- From: "jean" <try_to@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 12:38:37 -0500
"Neil Harrington" <neil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
UZOdnbgX2JyQi1XanZ2dnUVZ_rmjnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Father Kodak" <dont_bother@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gt4fs3pt27oukn9lpobbk448mjgfndjpqs@xxxxxxxxxx
Am I the only one who finds this endless drivel borrrrrrring and
immature?
Rita, or whoever "it" really is, I wish I knew what to say to "it,"
except that it's time to go out and play with the other kids in the
sandbox.
I got a D3 about a month ago, and I'm very happy with it. Isn't that
enough?
It should be enough for you, certainly.
A lot of what you're talking about is more or less like Ford fans arguing
with Chevy fans about which is best. Such arguments ("nyahh nyahh") are
fun for people who enjoy that sort of exchange and of little interest to
those who don't. If you find it "borrrrrrrrrring" why read it?
I'm a Nikon guy myself and I recognize that Canon is my chosen make's
chief competitor. As such, I do like to read about which brand is getting
ahead of the other technologically, and how. It's just a matter of general
interest for me. Sure, there are some immature comments made by either
side but those are easy to skip over.
Indeed, it is competition and drives the maket. Whatever is done better by
one maker will be copied and improved by the other, all to the benefit of
the users.
Jean
.
- References:
- Who care really if the D3 is better/worse than some Canon model?
- From: Father Kodak
- Re: Who care really if the D3 is better/worse than some Canon model?
- From: Neil Harrington
- Who care really if the D3 is better/worse than some Canon model?
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Re: Automatic ISO versus Manual Setting
- Next by Date: looking for compact, professional dye sub printer
- Previous by thread: Re: Who care really if the D3 is better/worse than some Canon model?
- Next by thread: O People of the Book!?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|