Re: D300 auto-iso
- From: Chris Savage <spam.goes.here@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:16:53 +0000
On 2008-02-28, me@xxxxxxxx <me@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:02:27 -0500, in rec.photo.digital "Rita Berkowitz"
<ritaberk2008@xxxxxxx> wrote:
And you can't do this using (S)hutter priority? Sheesh, my suspicions that
you are trolling have been confirmed. Now stop your fucken morphing.
Says you, who keeps adding aus.photo and rec.photo.equipment.35mm to the
groups list every time you reply.
That's perfectly reasonable behaviour -- just means Rita is
volunteering himself for the killfile. Filtering out aus.photo makes a
huge difference to the SNR around here.
--
Chris Savage Kiss me. Or would you rather live in a
Gateshead, UK land where the soap won't lather?
- Billy Bragg
.
- References:
- Re: D300 auto-iso
- From: C J Campbell
- Re: D300 auto-iso
- Prev by Date: Re: Digital Photo Frames - 16:9 Why?
- Next by Date: O People of the Book!?
- Previous by thread: Re: D300 auto-iso
- Next by thread: polarizing filter
- Index(es):