Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?

"David J Taylor" <david-taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
"David J Taylor"
<david-taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
So *I* said nothing that equates to "not exceding
1000:1", which is something *you* made up. A
manufactured quote...

"A good match for 10-bit cameras" means that the two are
close, and the film maybe even wins.

10 bits - 1000:1 - first order

But "not exceding" is entirely a limitation of *your*
fabrication. I said no such thing.

And what does "under typical conditions" have to do with
it that was *not* inferred already? Even under unusual
conditions film just doesn't have as much dynamic range
as the typical top of the line DSLRs today (Canon 1DsIII
and Nikon D3).

What you suggested is to compare to a film that was
discontinued a decade ago, and indeed one which
*doesn't* even get your fabricated 1000:1 ratio!

I chose the first transfer characteristic I was able to find.

The fact that it doesn't support your claims is
significant, eh? Even the Kodak curves for Tri-X don't
support you.

Here's another URL to review. Note the age of this
webpage, and the fact that DSLR's today are running more
than 2 fstops _better_ than the one shown.

http://www.normankoren.com/digital_tonality.html#Dynamic_range

which also shows Tri-X film as having somewhat more than a 10-bit (3 in
log base 10) range.

It shows Tri-X at *less* than 10 stops. About 2.8, not
3.0, or roughly about 631:1, for 56 dB of dynamic range.

The difference is, I think, that the film's greater dynamic range occurs

The film's *lesser* dynamic range.

That same page shows a Canon EOS-10D to have about 8.47
bits, or 355:1 for about 51 dB. But of course a lot of
water has gone under the bridge since then, and typical
digital SLRs today are all above 9 bits, many are above
10, and the best are over 11 (2048:1 or 66 dB).

Roger Clark lists 11 different cameras with more than 10
fstops of dynamic range, and that excludes of course all
of the newer models (Nikon D300 and D3, Canon Mark III):

http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/digital.signal.to.noise/index.html

in a less useful region than digital's. Note that in figure 4 the film
has not saturated when the graph stops.

Here is Kodak's webpage with info on TriX. You are
welcome search for circumstances that look better:

http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/support/techPubs/f9/f9.jhtml

--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@xxxxxxxxxx
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How far...
    ... especially DSLRs have higher dynamic range than film. ... Telling me the cameras would help. ... just like photographers have to learn to expose slide ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
    ... "A good match for 10-bit cameras" means that the two are ... and the film maybe even wins. ... fabrication. ... 3.0, or roughly about 631:1, for 56 dB of dynamic range. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Digital newbie looking for camera
    ... photography to digital. ... I'm used to cameras such as Mamiya RB and RZ, ... they just doesn't have the exposure latitude of film. ... Some photographers are using High Dynamic Range ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Nikon D70 DSLR on microscope: Update
    ... The dynamic range of digital vs. film needs some clarification. ... microscopy camera with a 14 or even 16-bit A/D offers a comparable dynamic ... most digital cameras offers at least as much dynamic range as color slide ...
    (sci.techniques.microscopy)
  • Digital Dynamic Range and Exposure Latitude
    ... Digital Dynamic Range and Exposure Latitude ... But in case anyone is interested in some data and images ... A big problem with film versus digital and what each ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)