Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- From: "David J Taylor" <david-taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:59:49 GMT
Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
[]
Film can't match a typical 12-bit digital camera, though
it's a good match for 10-bit cameras.
I would cite a list of URLs for you, but it is rather
obvious that this is a learning problem, not just a
matter of seeing the data. You've probably seen all of
it before, and clearly have just decided not to learn
anything.
To each his own; there can be advantages to such an
approach.
No need for a list of URLs, just one or two supporting your position (that
film has a dynamic range of not significantly more than 1000:1) would
suffice.
Thanks,
David
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- From: nospam
- Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- References:
- Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- From: David J Taylor
- Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- From: David J Taylor
- Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- Prev by Date: Re: Compact Camera with RAW - what's the cheapest possible one ?
- Next by Date: Re: Two buck light tent
- Previous by thread: Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- Next by thread: Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|