Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?



Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
"Mr. Strat" <rag@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <fitjnt$cei$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wilba
<wilba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You can say for sure that none of you highlights are blown, or you
have detail in the shadows, or the compromise between the two is
optimal?

There are situations where blown highlights or lost shadow detail are
going to happen due to the limited dynamic range of digital.

Digital has moe dynamic range than film.

No, it doesn't - film has a more gentle way of handling highlights, where
as digital clips. Possible exception, some sensors with dual photo-sites,
but these are in the minority.

David


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DSLR vs P&S a replay of Film vs Digital?
    ... Digital has moe dynamic range than film. ... the same way it handles shadows too... ... The advantage with an electronic sensor of course is ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: DYNAMIC RANGE LOVES THE 40D!
    ... The dynamic range is not all that great and the shadows on the horse ... I don't know about print film but a decent reversal ... That's DR compression and is what negative film has ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)
  • Re: Digital wishlist
    ... Film does it considerably more gracefully. ... Look at a print with blown highlights from either one and the film print looks nicer. ... If you meter correctly for digital's characteristic curve, you do much better than film at all levels, including all the way up to and including film's complete saturation. ... Because if you did, you could do a better job than with any film because digital has higher signal to noise, higher tonality, and higher dynamic range than film. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Megapixels and the cost of geometric progression
    ... This is a meaningless comparison because the film is effectively analogue and you have not even suggested how many bits it is equivalent to, merely the density range it covers. ... The continuous nature of film means that it is just as capable of reproducing tonal variations in the shadows as it is in the highlights and only granular noise limits the dynamic range. ... Originally this was implemented in analogue video systems primarily to compensate for the gamma response of CRTs, however it turns out that the response of a CRT is a close approximation to the inverse response of our visual response, so the same process has been retained for digital still images. ... page: http://www.clarkvision.com/visastro/omva1 Figure 2.5 shows the threshold contrast as a function of brightness in stellar magnitudes per square arc-second. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: William Mortensen, Ansel Adams, Robert Balcomb
    ... highlights and _developed_ for shadows. ... Your shadows will be underexposed and deep black (what he ... The characteristics of at least Kodak film was published ... speeds doubled overnight! ...
    (rec.photo.darkroom)

Quantcast