Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- From: Marvin <physchem@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:53:55 GMT
Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark) wrote:
<snip>
Yes, the square root of the dark current is the thermal noise.
Dark current is generally low in modern cameras, a fraction
of an electron per second, so it takes a while for it
to become a factor. It is higher with higher temperatures,
like 100F it could be several/second. The simple solution
is take multiple short exposures and add them together.
Effectively, with this technique, dark current is not an issue.
Roger
The first part is correct. The second isn't. Combining several exposures reduces the noise according to the square root of the number of images. Combining four photos
lowers the noise only by a factor of 2. To reduce noise by a factor of 4, you would have to combine 16 images.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- From: John Sheehy
- Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- References:
- dynamic range and thermal noise
- From: Marc Wossner
- Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- From: Scott W
- Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- From: Marc Wossner
- Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- dynamic range and thermal noise
- Prev by Date: Re: Starfields from "bulb" and RAW?
- Next by Date: Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- Previous by thread: Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- Next by thread: Re: dynamic range and thermal noise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|