Per page cost of printing (ink) by manufacturer
- From: Alan Browne <alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 13:38:06 -0400
Kodak have recently launched their "ThInk" campaign claiming much lower per page costs on home printers.
The following PCWorld link shows that their advantage is more marginal than claimed. (PCWorld did their own tests). I assume these are 4x6" prints, but I'm not completely sure.
Epson are not in this chart, unfortunately.
http://www.pcmag.com/image_popup/0,1871,iid=187007,00.asp from
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1895,2183959,00.asp
The special 4x6" printers are significantly more expensive per image:
(one Epson, one HP)
http://www.pcmag.com/image_popup/0,1871,iid=187006,00.asp
"Longevity" of the prints is not presented either, but most claim long life if not in direct/harsh lighting.
Cheers,
Alan
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Best dig camera for close up document photos?
- Next by Date: Canon Powershot A640 or A650IS
- Previous by thread: Evolution of the DVC
- Next by thread: Canon Powershot A640 or A650IS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
