Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- From: Eric Miller <millereric_nospam_@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:59:08 -0500
The cyclist is part of both pictures, so it must be part of the
original.
Not true. Because the photos were taken from the same position, the cyclist could have been added to either photo.
The white bus has been edited out from one position and has been
edited in at an adjacent position.
Perhaps, but the "white bus" is from two separate images. This is apparent by the fact that the occupants of the white bus are in different positions in both images.
The question is whether the white
bus was on the left or right of the cyclist in the original picture.
You can closely examine the difference between the original and the
manipulated image by opening them in photoshop (or gimp) in a single
document with each of the pictures on a separate layer and zoom to
100% or more visibility while turning the top layer off and on or
changing the blending mode.
Yes, I will do that when I have time.
Eric Miller
www.dyesscreek.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- From: sobriquet
- Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- References:
- method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- From: sobriquet
- Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- From: Eric Miller
- Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- From: sobriquet
- method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- Prev by Date: Re: Panasonic Lumix FZ18
- Next by Date: Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- Previous by thread: Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- Next by thread: Re: method to reveal photoshop manipulations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|