Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- From: "gerrit" <gthart@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2007 19:28:18 +0800
"Pooh-Man" <not_for@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%oYri.220834$LL7.176560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"gerrit" <gthart@xxxxxx> wrote in messageI
news:46afef48$0$31403$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Maybe they are all into saving bandwidth?
Weren't you concerned about that in another ng yesterday?
ooh, I have a stalker.
On second thoughts this kind of fake was shown quite some time ago and
others have already commented there.
WTF are you talking about "this kind of fake"? Did you even visit the link
posted? Me thinks not.
It is a fake because it is not one image but a series of images "stuck"
together on a website and you can "zoom" into individual parts of the
"image".
This was first done by a Dutch University crowd and there was a discussion
about it on usenet at the time.
I did go to the website to have a look and quickly realised what it was.
Stalker? I replied to another post of yours on
rec.photo.digital.slr-systems where you were involved in a discussion about
top-posting of replies and the following exchange took place:
""Pooh-Man" <not_for@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:VQFri.202128$LL7.181303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"mike o'sullivan" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5h5hucF3jj8e8U2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, because if you're top-posting it doesn't matter!
It does if you care about saving bandwidth. I expect you are a litter bug
too.
Oh Pooh-Man if you are so worried about the consumption of bandwidth why did
you post this URL in another forum? http://www.harlem-13-gigapixels.com/
Gerrit"
I had at that time only just seen your post in this thread and thought you
were being a little inconsistent so I wrote the above. Subsequently when you
had not answered but repeated your post in this thread I thought I would
remind you!
Stalking? I think not - unless you happen to also go by the name of
Douggie.
Gerrit
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- From: Pooh-Man
- Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- From: John McWilliams
- Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- References:
- Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- From: Pooh-Man
- Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- From: gerrit
- Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- From: Pooh-Man
- Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- Prev by Date: Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- Next by Date: Photosjop CS is my latest update
- Previous by thread: Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- Next by thread: Re: Never mind megapixels, we need gigapixels
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading