Re: Exposure time im space
- From: "Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" <username@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 21:09:03 -0600
John Bean wrote:
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 14:04:51 -0600, "Roger N. Clark (change
username to rnclark)" <username@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
and if
it has an atmosphere, the absorption of sunlight through
the atmosphere.
So you think the planetary atmosphere wouldn't affect a 18%
grey card?
That's why I said "absorption of sunlight through
>> the atmosphere." In the case of the earth, absorption
is about 15% (a little more in the blue; a little
less in the red). That's about 0.2 stop.
Mars has more of a problem with scattering by red
dust in the atmosphere. Titan (moon of Saturn)
has both more absorption and scattering. The absorption
is several stops (I don't remember the exact number
off the top of my head) in the visible.
Or did you mean exposing from a grey card in space at the
same distance drom the sun as the planet - which isn't what
the OP asked.
No that is not what I meant.
Like I said earlier, piece of string until some more
parameters are defined.
Since "it is done all the time" these are well understood
and well modeled problems.
Roger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Exposure time im space
- From: John Bean
- Re: Exposure time im space
- References:
- Exposure time im space
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: Exposure time im space
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: Exposure time im space
- From: John Bean
- Exposure time im space
- Prev by Date: extension lenses and compact digital cameras
- Next by Date: Re: Questions About The Fuji S6000 Camera
- Previous by thread: Re: Exposure time im space
- Next by thread: Re: Exposure time im space
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|