Re: Do you set your camera at high resolution?



ASAAR offered these thoughts for the group's consideration of
the matter at hand:

It just confounded me
that multiple camera stores assured me that both Nikon and
Canon DSLRs were capable of low-noise images at high ISO and
Boom! smacked right in the forehead with Pop Photography.
The mag did say, though, that the 20D was far superior to
the Rebel, maybe it should be at its much higher price!
<grin>

It was early 2005, as far as I can tell. I haven't tested
any of the Canon DSLRs myself so I can't usefully comment
further.

That's Pop Photo for you. When pro's want the real poop,
that's
their Mecca. On the other hand, I put more faith in the many
shared experiences here that considered the Rebel XT to be one
of the best for low noise. Here's some of what DPReview had
to say about image quality, ISO, noise, etc. :

I almost hesitate to reply here. I am not a regular reader of
Popular Photography, I just happned to see the one issue I
mentioned. All I can say is that the "prevailing view" of the
Rebel as a low-noise camera is not echoed in my personal
experience.

As you can see there's almost no visible difference in noise
levels between the EOS 350D and EOS 20D, our measured results
(see graph below) show that the 350D's noise levels are very
slightly higher between ISO 800 and 1600. Image sharpness is
also virtually identical with a slight softening at ISO 800
and 1600 but nothing like the levels we have seen from other
cameras.

Conclusion

º Excellent resolution, a clear match for the EOS 20D
º Good color, default +1 parameter set means punchy images
out of the camera º Noise free 'silky smooth' images at ISO
100, 200 and 400 º Very good in-camera image processing,
JPEG's almost as good as processed RAW's º Very low noise
levels even at ISO 1600, virtually unnoticeable below this
º Excellent seven point AF system, fast, good in low light
and reliable . . .
º Almost no noise in long exposures, optional noise reduction
if required

--
HP, aka Jerry
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: S6500FD/S6000FD owners report
    ... every camera you've ever commented upon. ... take for you to grow disenchanted with the FZ8's noise? ... batteries.Never required or will purchase a spare battery for the F20, ... greatest in the middle of the ISO range. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: A beginner question
    ... of calculating exposure times of astronomical objects ... ISO values with dim astronomical targets is rarely advantageous. ... because the important components of noise are amplified at the same rate ... When I looked at the question concerning a magnitude 5.8 object on a terrestrial camera, I had no scale to equate this to daytime photography. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: Panasonic DMZ-FZ8 versus comparable dSLR
    ... ISO 200, which is the D70's lowest ISO setting, but the noise on the ... D70 at ISO 200 is essentially non-existent while on the FZ5, noise is ... I personally almost always shoot with my FZ8 at ISO 100, ... artifacts from in camera processing. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Canon 5D stomps Sigma SD14 into the dust
    ... equipped 5D's images. ... ISO 1600 (from what I've seen, things currently turn nasty much before ... There were lots of ISO 800 images, and there was quite a bit of noise; ... personally wouldn't pay so much for this camera. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: Just when you started believe the low noise myth
    ... This is about the maximum latitude in a scene a Canon CMOS digital sensor can cope with before resorting to software enhancement to compensate for noise. ... All the others produce noise in shadows at ISO 100 which 5Ds don't. ... One of the real problems I though this post would highlight, is that reports from sources closely aligned with camera makers - read that as "don't bite the hand that feeds them" - are so distorted as to only present the very best possible report of a product. ... Anyone owning a 20D or a 30D who consistently "exposes for highlights" will sooner or later get pictures like this. ...
    (rec.photo.equipment.35mm)

Loading