Re: Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- From: ASAAR <caught@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 05:22:38 -0400
On Thu, 31 May 2007 09:07:36 +0100, dennis@home wrote:
Easy, eh? You'll know when you do need to shoot raw.
Just after you have missed that once in a lifetime shot that needed raw?
It would just be my luck that the only once in a lifetime shot
that ever comes my way would need an MF digital back much more than
raw from a small sensor. :)
It is worth remembering that if you can't take it in raw you can't
take it in jpeg but not vice versa.
Hmm. My Fuji can take a long burst of 40 fine jpg shots, but is
limited to only one raw shot. It's not quite that bad with my
Nikon, where it can buffer bursts of up to 16 fine jpg images and up
to 4 RAW images. Ok, I realize that you're talking more about image
quality than the number of shots taken, but a shot that's taken is
of far greater quality than one that's missed. :)
.
- References:
- Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- From: ole kvaal
- Re: Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- From: Ray Fischer
- Re: Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- From: dennis@home
- Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- Prev by Date: Re: Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- Next by Date: Re: dmc-fz30, fz50 video out
- Previous by thread: Re: Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- Next by thread: Re: Should a newbie start shooting RAW?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
