Re: Top 5 Advanced Digital Cameras

ASAAR <caught@xxxxxx> wrote:
That said, it's a computer magazine after all, and considering
that PC World doesn't specialize in cameras, they did a creditable
job with their limited camera reviews.


I beg to differ as optical zoom has no place in a DSLR camera review. Further,
a credible attempt should have been made to compare the cameras with
essentially equial lenses on them, not a 3X on one and a 7.5X on another!
This review is nothing but an amateur P&S reviewer looking [incorrectly] at
DSLRs. The individual review pages are far better than the initial summary
page, which is completely inadequate and misleading.

--
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: D281 77A5 63EE 82C5 5E68 00E4 7868 0ADC 4EFB 39F0


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: S & T uses low end paper
    ... > Equipment reviewers often know a lot more about telescopes than we ... Camera reviews aren't quite as bad ... given camera model. ... When I read a review of a product I'm considering buying I want to know what ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Thoughts re: Panasonic PV-GS65 ?
    ... Negatives are no analog input and only 10x optical zoom. ... Can any current owner give me a short "review"? ... I'm thinking of buying this ...
    (rec.video.production)