Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- From: "Robert A. Cunningham" <infojunkie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 03:36:30 -0800
"Ron Hunter" <rphunter@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:lbGdnSmzGvGxsHTYnZ2dnUVZ_hninZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
M-M wrote:
In article'Very powerful telescope'??? My brother had a 6" reflector that gave much
<45e910e1$0$31100$5a62ac22@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Joan" <Joan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
yeah riight!
You really don't see it? It's quite clear to me, though I'm used to
seeing it through a telescope so I know what it looks like.
OK then, here is that same crop next to a diagram of how it would look in
a very powerful telescope:
http://www.mhmyers.com/d80/sat1-2.jpg
better images than that. Also a good set of 16x50 binoculars allows easy
identification of the four larger moons. Quite impressive if the rings
are in a good position.
I'm guessing the "four larger moons" visible through 16x50 binolculars
belong to Jupiter, not Saturn. Am I correct?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- From: Ron Hunter
- Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- References:
- Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- From: Joan
- Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- From: Ron Hunter
- Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- Prev by Date: Tips on making your Digital Background
- Next by Date: Re: better big optical zoom or big megapixels?
- Previous by thread: Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- Next by thread: Re: Saturn's Rings Handheld at 300mm
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|