Re: DPI and PPI



Dave Martindale wrote:

Dave Martindale wrote:

The actual PPI of the sensor is very useful if you want to do any
calculations involving actual image distances. For example, if you
have mounted the camera on a telescope, and see two features a certain
number of pixels apart in the image, you can determine their true
angular separation in the sky if you know the sensor PPI and the
telescope objective FL. Or if the camera is mounted on a microscope
and you know the microscope objective magnification, you can measure
distances in the subject.

"J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Now how many photographers actually _do_ this in the real world? Not
astronomers or surveyors or the like, but photographers for whom the image
is the end product and not a means of performing a measurement?

So if I do something useful with an image, not merely pictorial, I'm no
longer a photographer? Photographers take photographs, period.
There's no requirement that the purpose must be pictorial to qualify as
a photographer. I'm neither an astronomer nor a surveyor nor a
machinist, but I do use photography to measure things.

In any case, that was one example. Here's a more pictorial one: With a
DSLR, you have a sensor of a particular size, and you often have several
different lenses with a range of focal lengths in order to be able to
make the subject of a particular photo approximately the desired size
on the sensor. In other words, you change lenses to get the field of
view that you want.

In astrophotography, each telescope has just one fixed focal length,
which determines its image scale. If you have multiple telescopes, you
may have multiple focal lengths available. You may also have multiple
cameras. Knowing the PPI or pixel pitch of the camera sensors helps you
choose which telescope and camera to use when capturing an object of a
particular (angular) size.

The focal length of lenses for photography is virtually always marked
on the lenses, because the information helps you to choose the lens you
want for a particular shot without trying all the ones in your bag.
Similarly, sensor PPI or pixel pitch helps choose the right camera to
use in some situations where the lens FL is fixed - why would you ignore
that info if it is available?

You clearly have special needs that are outside the mainstream of
photography.

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
.



Relevant Pages

  • To^i sa(p su*?a mua may Camera ro^`i nha
    ... The Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III is an engineering tour de force which, ... An entirely new 21.1-megapixel full-frame Canon CMOS sensor ... speed up data handling and camera operation, ... stages of digital photography, the EOS-1Ds Mark III's Dual "DIGIC III" ...
    (soc.culture.vietnamese)
  • Re: The sickening reality of high ISO on a P&S
    ... the same image quality as a dslr. ... Add either or both of these small additions to your photography ... slightly greater detail retention when upsampled directly in the camera for JPG ... P&S smaller sensor cameras can and do have wider dynamic range than larger ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: budding photographer
    ... inexpensive p&s camera is a superb tool for taking snapshots. ... Blurry images and sensor noise are both intentional ... P&S cameras can have more seamless zoom range than any DSLR glass in ... Add either or both of these small additions to your photography ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: The sickening reality of high ISO on a P&S
    ... technical standpoint than a smaller sensor. ... Add either or both of these small additions to your photography ... which do not reduce the lens' original aperture one ... slightly greater detail retention when upsampled directly in the camera for JPG ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Maximum Possible Aperture Size (Planck scale airy disc?)
    ... are only imaging the linear size in the camera and not the ... plane which coincides with the ccd sensor location. ... and you don't have a telescope anymore. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)