Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Phil Wheeler <w6tuh-ng7@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2006 17:32:47 GMT
Neil Harrington wrote:
"Phil Wheeler" <w6tuh-ng7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:42vng.4057$MF6.1250@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Dave Martindale wrote:
"Neil Harrington" <not@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
The confusion perhaps results from the fact that these image-stabilization methods use devices called gyrosensors. A gyrosensor is not a gyroscope; it contains nothing that spins, and without spinning you can't have a gyroscope.
So, would you say that a ring laser gyroscope is really not a gyroscope
at all?
This all sounds like an endless and pointless terminology quibble.
It's really a discussion about how the things work. Many users in this thread clearly believe there are actual gyroscopes in all these IS lenses. I don't.
True .. and the best way to end this is to refer to a definitive source (e.g., Canon) vs. a bunch of folks trying to invent a description.
Phil
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Neil Harrington
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- References:
- image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: MichaelM
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Mike Fields
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Daniel Silevitch
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Neil Harrington
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Dave Martindale
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Phil Wheeler
- Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- From: Neil Harrington
- image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- Prev by Date: WTB - Used/Broken/non-working Sony DSC-W5 Cybershot Digital Camera.
- Next by Date: Re: Olympus E1 vs. E500
- Previous by thread: Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- Next by thread: Re: image stabilisation ~ how does it work?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|