Re: I 'm learning to love raw
- From: "Gene Palmiter" <palmiter_gene@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 03:56:27 GMT
I might shoot JPEG when I am not taking important work. If I am documenting
a political meeting for instance. The client just wants a CD for their uses.
They don't know how to adjust them and I don't know how they are going to
print them. They will send them to a webmaster or DTP person who may not be
able to open a RAW.
Other notes: Isn't there a camera brand that uses .RAW for an
extension...Canon maybe. That make the all caps appropriate....I think.
I do convert my RAW (ORF for me) to DNG as I take them off the chip. I might
loose some EXIF information...not sure....haven't missed it yet.
--
Thanks,
Gene Palmiter
(visit my photo gallery at http://palmiter.dotphoto.com)
freebridge design group
"BD" <bobby_dread@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1149024427.035038.194910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
There is a perception by some that shooting raw is more work then
shooting jpegs.
I think that the misconception is more that it's tougher to work with
after the fact than JPEG, and that there are a few variants of RAW,
which are often specific to the manufacturer of the camera.
But for me, I use BreezeBrowser Pro to mass-convert the RAWs to JPEGS
for quick and easy browsing; and then use Camera Raw in Photoshop to
adjust the images as required... Results are far better than if I'd
shot to JPEG directly.
BD
.
- References:
- I 'm learning to love raw
- From: Scott W
- Re: I 'm learning to love raw
- From: BD
- I 'm learning to love raw
- Prev by Date: Re: How to repair photos with bad lighting?
- Next by Date: Re: D70 icc profile
- Previous by thread: Re: I 'm learning to love raw
- Next by thread: Re: I 'm learning to love raw
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|