Re: [OT - US/Canada] E-85 - Strategic conservation

Alan Browne wrote:

J. Clarke wrote:

Alan Browne wrote:


As this thread has splintered into a variety of useful and useless
branches the following occured to me last night.

The United States spends an incredible amount of money to protect its
oil supply worldwide as a strategic economic neccesity. It pays in many
lives as well as taxpayer money.

Why does the United States not take a "strategic" initiative with
respect to reducing oil _consumption_? This would mean:

1) Mandating higher gasoline taxes for gas guzzlers and credits to
efficient cars.

With todays technology an RFID can easilly be mated to a vehicle licence
plate to tell the pump what tax rate/rebate to apply to a particular
vehicle. This is better than revising CAFE and will self adjust as the
mpg goal changes every few years. Even set a goal mpg where the
gasoline is free for vehicles that meet the goal (paid for by the worst
guzzlers).


So how many days do you think it is going to take before a market
develops in bootleg RFID devices which report to the pump that your
Navigator is a moped?

If a "Moped" comes to the pump, the pump will allow it x gallons. That
RFID code is suspended for 24 hours.




2) Part of thje guzzler tax would go to the "efficient" users, part of
the taxes would go to funding for more mass transit.


What is an "efficient user"?

It begins with a choice of an efficient vehicle. If you _really_ need a
larger vehicle, you'll certainy be willing to pay for it.




3) Mandating minimum ethanol content in all gasoline (10%).


Which accomplishes what other than a farm subsidy?

See other posts. Asked and answered.


4) Mandating speed governors on vehicles with a radio module that
receives speed limit data from road side transmitters. The vehcile
would be allowed a 10 mph above limit buffer, but no more.


So how long do you think it will be before people discover that putting
some tinfoil around the antenna or cutting the wire to it causes the
governor to respond as if it is in an area where control has not yet been
implemented?

The next layer of this is enforcement of course. Much like if you sell
cigarettes untaxed or sell moonshine.


Sure, you can come up with counterstrategies. In every case they will
cost more to implement than they will cost to defeat.

Since there are a lot of counterstrategies it would appear that they
payoff. For example, last time I was in Munich, the subway had no
attendants or turnstiles. You paid, you punched the right number of
lines for the distance and off you went. From time to time there is an
inspection party. Big fines for cheating...

The real point is not all the implementation details, but the
recognition that left to their own freewill, most people will continue
to waste energy prolifically. It is quite easy to turn that off.

If the majority of the people want to "waste energy prolifically" then why
should the democratically elected government deny them this?

Seems to me that you want to go around telling other people how to live
their lives because you disapprove of their evil ways.

What is wrong with "wasting energy prolifically"? Thrift will just delay
the inevitable, not prevent it.


--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [OT - US/Canada] E-85 - Strategic conservation
    ... The United States spends an incredible amount of money to protect its ... oil supply worldwide as a strategic economic neccesity. ... With todays technology an RFID can easilly be mated to a vehicle licence ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Lloyd- is S&S getting Batman?
    ... Someone broke the front window trying to get in my business, ... intentions of buying one and money saved ready to do it. ... Not worth fixing he had to buy a vehicle worthy of transportation. ... This isn't a feel sorry for Lloyd post, but I do hope there is some ...
    (rec.games.pinball)
  • Re: A racial incident
    ... smarter to apply some monies from there to a new vehicle. ... car with no down payment. ... By that time we will have save up enough money to do an outright ... Since I pay cash for cars and boats, ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Spaceship One stepping-stone or dead-end?
    ... What is your defination of 'cheap'. ... > then find all sorts of problems that need more money to fix like NASA did? ... agreement that an orbital vehicle will cost a lot more than SS1. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Mobile Phone use on petrol forecourt
    ... near a petrol pump). ... perimeter of a petrol forecourt. ... The words 'phone use' and moving vehicle seemed to have alerted everyone ...
    (uk.legal)
Loading