Re: camera or lens?
- From: "J. Clarke" <jclarke.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2006 06:35:01 -0400
ASAAR wrote:
On Mon, 15 May 2006 18:10:48 -0700, Bill Funk, who might live better
if he consumes more fiber (carbon fiber, that is) wrote:
It's not a bad question, really. Should the new buyer spend the
initial load of money on great lenses, or a great body?
The new buyer might be better off spending lots of money (even if
he has really good Molonic hands) on a really great . . . tripod.
Having just picked up a Manfrotto 190MF4 and spent some time exploring its
capabilities I agree wholeheartedly with that. Anybody who has never used
a _good_ tripod doesn't know what he's missing.
<g>
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
.
- References:
- camera or lens?
- From: Conrad
- Re: camera or lens?
- From: All Things Mopar
- Re: camera or lens?
- From: Paul J Gans
- Re: camera or lens?
- From: All Things Mopar
- Re: camera or lens?
- From: Bill Funk
- Re: camera or lens?
- From: ASAAR
- camera or lens?
- Prev by Date: Re: Nikon D50 versus Canon Rebel XT
- Next by Date: Re: A Compact Camera For Low Light Spaces
- Previous by thread: Re: camera or lens?
- Next by thread: Re: camera or lens?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
