Re: 1.5X Sensors VS. Full Frame and other questions...

Bryan Olson wrote:
Mark² wrote:
Alfred Molon wrote:
[...]
True, I hadn't noticed that. So F4.8 doesn't give you sufficient DOF
in such a situation?

If you are that unfamiliar with depth of focus, it seems a little
odd that you have been arguing with such tenacity. ...On the other
hand...that may explain a lot.
:)

The issue is depth of field, not depth of focus.

"Mental typo."


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 1.5X Sensors VS. Full Frame and other questions...
    ... If you are that unfamiliar with depth of focus, it seems a little odd that you have been arguing with such tenacity. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Colors in music.
    ... Which strikes me as kind of odd really. ... I wasn't arguing that blindness isn't a disadvantage. ... I was arguing that blindness wasn't a disadvantage for Ray Charles. ...
    (alt.guitar.bass)
  • Re: test post
    ... you're unfamiliar with matt aka binky-boy :-) ... FWIW, you're arguing with someone whom is considered by many to be more ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: test post
    ... you're unfamiliar with matt aka binky-boy :-) ... FWIW, you're arguing with someone whom is considered by many to be ...
    (comp.os.linux.security)
  • Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size
    ... Gordon Messmer: ... I know that you were already arguing against that point, ... your posting. ... But I did think it odd that *that* point of view ever ...
    (Fedora)
Loading