Re: 1.5X Sensors VS. Full Frame and other questions...



Progressiveabsolution wrote:
What exactly does the 1.5X crop do to the image that is produced from
the camera? In other words, does it degrade the quality of the
picture when comparing to a full framed camera body?

What is the essential difference in image quality between a full frame
body and a 1.5-1.6X cropped body?

How much of a difference is there in image quality between the full
frame body and the 1.5-1.6X sensor bodies?

I'm sure this has been answered but hopefully I can get some more info
on this.

Thanks all for your help!

The lens still projects a full-frame image...its just that the sensor only
sees the middle portion of it due to the sensor's size being smaller than
the full-frame projection. Think of it as a slide projector projecting a 6
foot wide image onto a 5 foot wide screen. The projected image stays the
same...you're just not catching all of it on the screen.

Because of this, image quality is not changed at all...rather, you are
simply (in effect), utilizing all your sensor's pixels on the "sweet spot"
of your lens. Some see this as an advantage due to decreased vignetting and
the use of only the sharpest portion of the lens. Others who want wide
angle may not like losing the wide angle of view they are used to...




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: 1.5X Sensors VS. Full Frame and other questions...
    ... picture when comparing to a full framed camera body? ... What is the essential difference in image quality between a full frame ... The lens still projects a full-frame image...its just that the sensor only ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: Canon finally makes an *f4* 70-200 IS...
    ... If it is a good as it can be, that should be an awesome lens. ... Image quality can be as good as my L lenses. ... "A disturbing new study finds that studies are disturbing" ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)
  • Re: "Babylon5" Hi-def (or Higher-def) Petition
    ... transfers for the composite shots an Joe mentioned. ... What really counts is the quality of the processing. ... theater and watching it on a TV. ... I've noticed that some people care more about image quality, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)
  • Re: Euclidean distances in L*a*b* - problem!
    ... Nitpicking over the film storage needs doesn't change the fact that as ... more storage space for the same quality, ... to achieve the same image quality. ... And you should be able to see the effects of sharpening on ...
    (sci.engr.color)
  • Re: D2Xs versus D200 etc.
    ... The best example is probably the D100/70/50/40 using the same sensor design with changes perhaps to AA filter, ... Moving up to a D80/200 there is a hit on dynamic range & noise with more MP but IMO the newer technology can overcome much of that and more MP really does give more detail and less noise because the noise is smaller grained therefore less noticeable and the processing technology is more advanced in newer models. ... I'd guess the D2x is not that great for noise & dynamic range due to old technology, the main difference is in build quality and pro features, just like the D80 & D200 should be nearly identical image quality but the D200 has a more robust build with more features, knobs, buttons & options. ...
    (rec.photo.digital.slr-systems)