Re: RAW images...
- From: floyd@xxxxxxxxxx (Floyd L. Davidson)
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:15:55 -0800
Kennedy McEwen <rkm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, I have checked it time and time again with different
images since you raised it and so far I haven't observed it once
at a compression rate that gives a file size about the same as
the original. It does become a problem if you increase the
compression rate to get a file size of half or less of the
original, but I suspect you would get similar problems without
any resizing anyway. So, in practice, it is a non issue.
Your inability to observe the effects does not make it a
non-issue for critical work.
In fact *any* change that causes the boundary for quantization
to change in non-multiples of the original will have the same
effect. If, for example, that is originally done on 8 pixel
boundaries, then shaving 2 pixels off the edge of the image
and saving it will have the indicated effects...
--
Floyd L. Davidson <http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson>
Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) floyd@xxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAW images...
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Re: RAW images...
- References:
- Re: RAW images...
- From: Joseph Meehan
- Re: RAW images...
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: RAW images...
- From: Joseph Meehan
- Re: RAW images...
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Re: RAW images...
- From: Floyd L. Davidson
- Re: RAW images...
- From: Kennedy McEwen
- Re: RAW images...
- Prev by Date: Re: Olympus E-500 DSLR comments please?
- Next by Date: Re: Olympus E-500 DSLR comments please?
- Previous by thread: Re: RAW images...
- Next by thread: Re: RAW images...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|