Re: Aperture and shutter speed in Digital cameras + general discussion
- From: "Fred" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 21:46:59 +0100
On a Canon DSLR (20D) you can see the aperture opening/closing through the
lens. Not a CCD power scenario, it is mechanical.
I personally think that the lack of large CCD's (or the CMOS sensors with
Canon) are due to idiotic marketing staff. I.E. The marketing/sales
department not knowing their arse from their elbow. They could have easily
provided full frame sensors with not that much of a cost increase to the
consumers, but they choose not to because they can make more money by having
APS-* sensors and also full/semi-full frame sensors.
However, it has bitten Canon in the arse, because they have lost a huge
amount of sales of wider 'L' lenses as a result of producing the lack of non
full frame bodies. For example, the 24-70 2.8 is a great lens, but on a
APS-* body, it is a crap focal range, as are the 16-35 and the 17-40 lenses.
Also remember, crop factor makes no difference when it comes to depth of
field. A 55mm 2.8 lens, is a 55mm 2.8 whatever.
All DSLR's should have had a minimum of 35mm sensor size! Of course, if the
20D had a full frame sensor, then the majority of pros would have bought one
instead of a pro body, but the short sighted marketing staff didn't
anticipate the huge amount of sales they would have got from 'L' lens sales
as a result. But hell, what do I know?!? Honestly, I am tempted to go back
to film until things settle down a bit.
"SS" <xsx2000x@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:XFWWf.26354$Nh7.23145@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In a conventional camera an iris controls the aperture and a mechanicalor
shutter is altered to control the shutter speed - is this the same in a
digital camera? I have not 'seen' anything that looks like an iris and
presumably shutter speed is controlled by how long the CCD is powered up
sampled, not a mechanical device. Of course ISO is a function ofhas
amplification of the signal (hence noise problems at high ISO) and focus
got to be by movement of the lens - or could this be done better bymovement
of the CCD? Since the lens retracts anyway i assume this function is usedthe
also for focus. Speaking of which how does auto focus work? i assumed that
the camera 'sees' a small area of high contrast and then focusses until
change between the 'gradient' of change between the 2 areas of contrast is
steepest (or more sudden = sharpest focus). What is the best method - do
some cameras do a better job and why? presumably as aperture gets smaller
focus becomes less critical as the characteristics of the lens reduce and
the 'pinhole' effect takes over.
Final question/tipic for discussion - as a larger CCD is supposedly much
better re. noise why don't we see larger CCDs on (all) cameras? Surely if
mass produced the cost increase would be negligible? Or is in camera
software/processing going to take the lead in picture enhancement? Would
this have to be done in camera or could the same effects be produced
(better?) post capture?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Aperture and shutter speed in Digital cameras + general discussion
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: Aperture and shutter speed in Digital cameras + general discussion
- From: Bill Funk
- Re: Aperture and shutter speed in Digital cameras + general discussion
- From: John McWilliams
- Re: Aperture and shutter speed in Digital cameras + general discussion
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: high-speed shot of gulfballs
- Next by Date: Re: Admit it; You'd like a Nikon FE-2 with a digital back
- Previous by thread: Aperture and shutter speed in Digital cameras + general discussion
- Next by thread: Re: Aperture and shutter speed in Digital cameras + general discussion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|