Re: having a lab print my digital panorama file




When you say that your file was scanned at 1200 resolution do you mean 1200
dpi? If so, that is a very low resolution scan and may not result in very
high print quality. With the file opened in Photoshop you will want to look
in the image size dialog box and see how many pixels per inch (that is PPI
not dpi) your image contains at its current size. Then with the resample
box UNchecked change your long dimension to 21.1" and again look at how many
ppi that you have. If, at that length you have 240 ppi or better you
probably have sufficient quality to produce an acceptable print. If you are
close to but below that figure you can probably check the resample box and
insert a higher ppi number and up-sample your image. If you are quite a bit
below 240 up-sampling will not be a very satisfactory solution. As far as
file size is concerned 553 MB is not all that large for an uncompressed pano
file.
Chuck


Well, I have to admit that I've always been confused by the
interchangeability of terms when people refer to DPI and resolution.
I should say that when I scanned the negative, I scanned it at "1200
dpi" setting under "resolution." When I opened it up in Photoshop, as
you suggested, I find that the pixels per inch is listed as 1200.
When I change the long dimension to 21", it changes my pixels per inch
to 395.143. It sounds like my quality should be just fine if I'm
understanding your e-mail correctly because my ppi is well above 240.

My main thing was I just wasn't sure what I had to do to make sure I
had the image set up so it would print to the correct size at the lab.
I never have to do this when I print at home. I scan a negative (or
take an existing digital photograph), open it up in Photoshop, tell
Photoshop I've got 8x10 paper loaded, and then drag the picture to
whatever size I want on the paper and hit print. This whole idea of
pre-sizing a picture for the lab was sort of foreign to me. Now that
I know 553 MB is not unusual for an uncompressed pano, I won't worry
so much.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: What size prints can I get?
    ... called controlled tests claiming that the human eye can resolve the equivalent of up to 660 PPI, based on arc minutes of angle of resolution. ... I said what I said because there are so many people that believe, rightly or wrongly, that to get the same "quality" - which is qualitative/subjective as well as quantitative - from a digital image as a well-exposed properly developed 35mm negative takes on the order of 16 mega pixels. ... This seems to be borne out by the rush to that MP resolution of the upper end digitals these days. ... This would produce in the range of 12 MP and could exceed 16 if the scanner can produce enough DPI without interpolating. ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: image processor..
    ... Because, contrary to what many people think, dpi is irrelevant for the ... they display an image at the resolution ... irrespective of what the ppi number may say. ... Take any color image into Photoshop, desaturate it and resave with no other ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.photoshop)
  • Re: Image size and printer DPI
    ... First of all the figures quoted for Printer Dpi, ... All of the printers you mention are capable of Superb Quality, ... Ppi rather than the 400 you quote. ... I have heard a Photoshop Guru / Lecturer advocate that, ...
    (comp.periphs.printers)
  • Re: image processor..
    ... Because, contrary to what many people think, dpi is irrelevant for the ... they display an image at the resolution ... irrespective of what the ppi number may say. ... Take any color image into Photoshop, desaturate it and resave with no other ...
    (comp.graphics.apps.photoshop)
  • Re: Making Large Photographs 30x36?
    ... The concept of PPI is totaly divorced from DPI, the only conection is that if your printer can't print to a DPI value that is a large multiple of the intended PPI, then the gradients in the printed image will have individual ink drops evident in the print. ... he know much about Photoshop but I have given a tip how to ... I suppose that isn't realy their fault, as Adobe is a bit vague in the resample dialogue in Photoshop as to what is actualy changing when either the image resolution, PPI or image size in pixels is changed. ...
    (alt.photography)