Re: F10 Revisited



On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:50:12 GMT, Monroe <minburn1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Been away from the scene for a bit. Last noted that the Fuji F10 gave
incredible low/existing light performance for a compact. I remember
some degree of higher ISO peformance. I've viewed some stunning
photos taken with that camera.

This last X_Xmas I purchased a FUJI F10 for my mother & I
agree that the low light picture quality is surprisingly good.
Indoors with flash it uses ISO=800. The flash can be turned off but
for mom, simplicity is a must so she uses it on full auto.

How does the current crop compare?

The newly announced FUJI F30 seems to build on the F10's
qualities which are limited to an ISO=1600, but the F30's top limit is
ISO=3200! Additionally it has considerably more new features as well,
read more here if interested:

http://www.steves-digicams.com/pr/fuji_02142006_f30_pr.html


I'm looking for a similar compact camera suitable for existing
light/indoor photos.

This might be the best option for your needs.

The one negative (for my use) is that the F10 did not have an optical
viewfinder (still don't really like the LCD's for all uses).

Here I tend to agree with you especially when used outdoors on
bright sunny days. But there is a potential work-around to this
problem too. It's not a perfect solution but it's very likely what I
will be getting for mine because I really like mom's F10 but need more
user controls, so the F30 seems like it will be a great alternative to
my DSLR when I want to travel light but still want reasonably nice low
light pictures. Anyway here is the potential work-around:

http://www.delkin.com/delkin_products_pop_up_shade_stickon_mini.html

B&H sells this device & is expecting the FUJI F30 to be
available some time MAY of 2006 For about $400 USD.

Hope this helps you decide what you want. Like I said I'm not
a huge fan of using an LCD to frame a picture in "all" situations
either but with my Canon A95 which has a swivel LCD, there is no way I
could have framed some odd angled shots without it, so it can be a
plus. The choice is yours, however I suspect that other camera
manufactures will not want to loose out on this growing segment of the
market & will eventually have quality offerings of their own but for
now it seems much like a 1 hoarse race in the low light P&S field!

Respectfully, DHB


"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Photo printer - good quality?
    ... quality was great for those. ... even with my 2 MP camera. ... > A 2 MP camera is usually only adequate for photos you want to send via ... If you are serious about printing photos, ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.photos)
  • Re: High speed camera vs. HD video
    ... HD video? ... approaches what a 2 megapixel cheap point and shoot camera can do. ... the image quality vastly improved using some very fancy mathematics ... when it comes to correcting photos. ...
    (alt.photography)
  • Re: Sharpest "Reasonably priced" Canon lens
    ... the higher image quality. ... I didn't see any links to photos in ... sky with camera X, and someone else on top of a mountain in Montana ... takes a photo of the moon while it is directly over head with camera ...
    (rec.photo.digital)
  • Re: High speed camera vs. HD video
    ... HD video? ... approaches what a 2 megapixel cheap point and shoot camera can do. ... the image quality vastly improved using some very fancy mathematics ... when it comes to correcting photos. ...
    (alt.photography)
  • Re: The sickening reality of high ISO on a P&S
    ... I'm not attacking the quality of your ... All I'm saying is that given the same conditions, a dslr is capable of ... You've shown from your own experience as a p&s camera enhusiast. ... at some samples of pictures from the Sony A900 with one of the Carl ...
    (rec.photo.digital)