Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: "Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)" <username@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:01:05 -0700
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article <44144266.60205@xxxxxxxxx>, username@xxxxxxxxx says...
Somebody should explain why the noise level is the square root of the signal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution
The square root comes from the math of the Poisson
distribution.
Ok. Where on that page is written that the noise is the square root of the signal? I did a text search for "root" and found nothing.
In the box on the right side of the page, click on the link to variance.
Variance is the "mean squared deviation" so the noise in the Poisson
distribution is the square root of the variance.
Roger
.
- References:
- 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Rich
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: jpc
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: bjw
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Bill Funk
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Alfred Molon
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- From: Alfred Molon
- 1um pixels, anyone?
- Prev by Date: DOMESTICATED FELINES LOVE THE 20D !!!
- Next by Date: Re: Help need viewfinder hacks for compact LCD screens
- Previous by thread: Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- Next by thread: Re: 1um pixels, anyone?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|