Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Father Kodak <dont_bother@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:07:08 -0800
On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:59:57 -0700, "Roger N. Clark (change username
to rnclark)" <username@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Andrew Rowley wrote:
>
>> Paul Allen <"paul dot l dot allen at comcast dot net"> wrote:
>>
>>
>
>I agree.
>I wrote a database program in 1984, all using unix shell scripts
>and creating a set of ascii files that get searched linearly.
>Because of the simplicity, there is essentially no maintenance.
>It has been running since 1984 with no changes. The only maintenance
I'm no database administrator, but I suspect that you are vastly
simplifying the problem. At a minimum, don't you need a backup
strategy. Indices or disk organization to maximize search speed. A
security for access control and protection against unauthorized
modifications? A strategy for culling outdated information or
duplicates? For doing internal consistency checks? I never heard of
any large dataset where the data as input was 100% clean and useable.
>is to edit the list of disks to search or not search (we have about
>37 disks comprising 22.4 terabytes) and to copy the
>scripts to a new machine after a hardware
>upgrade. Currently there are 440,208 entries (the database is
>spectra) spread over 9,477 ascii files. A brute force linear
Whatever it is, it's pretty large!
>search of the ascii ascii files (a script using the unix grep
>command) with 440,208 entries takes 0.17
>second on an Itanium 2 unix system. One does not need a complex
>database.
This one is rich. Most of use don't have an Itanium 2 Unix system.
We use pokey old Pentium 4s or Athlons in single-processor systems.
Father Kodak
>
>Roger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Paul Allen
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- References:
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Paul Allen
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: (PeteCresswell)
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Paul Allen
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Andrew Rowley
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Paul Allen
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Andrew Rowley
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Paul Rubin
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Andrew Rowley
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Paul Allen
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Andrew Rowley
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- From: Roger N. Clark (change username to rnclark)
- Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- Prev by Date: Re: Canon Rebel XT & Lexar CF cards, how bad is it really?
- Next by Date: Re: Are you folks MAC or PC?
- Previous by thread: Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- Next by thread: Re: OK, stupid question about picture managment programs...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|