Re: Question about zoom
- From: hodapp87@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 3 Jan 2006 20:12:47 -0800
> >> Also, the image editing program has better resizing so you would end up
> >> with
> >> higher quality than what you would get with digital zoom in the camera. I
> >> doubt the camera uses bicubic resampling. In Photoshop CS2 the Bicubic
> >> Sharper works quite well.
> > Regardless of the algorithm used... if the camera is throwing away data
> > in the final step, digital zoom will still have more of this data, and
> > no sophisticated resampling algorithm can recover it from a JPEG where
> > it's been thrown away.
> >
HornBlower wrote:
> Not if you are not using digital zoom, you do the effect in Photoshop. Then
> the cameras is only doing noise reduction, sharpening a few other things. It
> isn't cropping and then resizing.
To make myself clear again...
Digital zoom provides data that would be otherwise thrown away in a
JPEG.
_No algorithm_ in Photoshop can recover this data from a JPEG that's
not digitally zoomed - all it can do is work with what is there and try
to invent the rest.
Try my experiment a few posts back. Use all the noise reduction and
sharpening algorithms you want in conjunction with the resample - but
you have to also do it on the digitally zoomed image, and compare with
that.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: Dimitris M
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: HornBlower
- Re: Question about zoom
- References:
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: Bob Williams
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: Dimitris M
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: hodapp87
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: HornBlower
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: hodapp87
- Re: Question about zoom
- From: HornBlower
- Re: Question about zoom
- Prev by Date: Re: Macro photography
- Next by Date: Re: here check this!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about zoom
- Next by thread: Re: Question about zoom
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|