Re: Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- From: "Bill Hilton" <bhilton665@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 14 Dec 2005 11:01:14 -0800
>ASAAR writes ...
>
>I wonder if people that use the "don't put all of your eggs in one
>basket" argument to justify using several flash cards instead of one
>large card would ever also suggest getting two P-2000s instead of
>one P-4000?
Instead of two P-2000's I'd suggest one P-2000 and one something else
with larger disk, lower cost but no preview ... I got a 100 GB
Wolverine for around $300 for example, so 2.5x more disk space for 60%
the cost (but no image preview). It's also a lot smaller than the
P-4000 so easier to carry.
>If the P-4000 died, *much* more would be lost than if a
>single card failed, and any hard drive is inherently more prone
>to failure than cards.
I agree, that's why I *never* erase/reformat a memory card until it's
been copied to TWO places (usually a laptop and small HD, or if I can't
take the laptop then two small HD's with CF readers) and I've verified
the images open in a RAW converter. This is often a pain in the ass
but for sure the hard drives will die one day and if you have your
files on only one you'll lose the data ...
Bill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- From: Royce
- Re: Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- References:
- Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- From: Royce
- Re: Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- From: ASAAR
- Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- Prev by Date: Re: Pentax Digital ist and manual Pentax lenses
- Next by Date: Re: Recommended External Flash for Kodak P850
- Previous by thread: Re: Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- Next by thread: Re: Epson P-2000 - is 40GB enough?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|