Re: Irfanview question
- From: Ron Hunter <rphunter@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:03:53 -0600
Cathy wrote:
The camera settings determine the source. Some drivers allow a choice from the computer, others decide based on how the camera settings indicate. In my old camera, I had to copy files from the card to memory, or memory to card, and use the card reader. The new camera can access either with the proprietary software. Generally, I use only the cards, saving the internal memory for emergencies (ie. full card with no spare on hand)."ASAAR" <caught@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:hg6vn1ddgthbhobqao5s20bqc6m3l89ve1@xxxxxxxxxxDec.On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:06:13 -0500, Cathy wrote:
I found out yesterday that as of Dec. 15, my ISP, one of the largest ISP's and TV cable companies in Canada will be dropping Usenet onthe15. I didn't get notified of this yet, but a local newsgroup postedoncenews. According to my ISP, so many people have Blogs and Instant Messenger and other things now, that Usenet is not as popular as itgetwas. I find that hard to believe. Its just some trumped up excuse torid of Usenet for their own agenda. They did say there is always(which I don't like as it is so cluttered looking). I liked doing newsgroups in OE when I do my mail. Pretty crappy way to treat their customers.I'd rather give up on usenet than use google groups. I've heard many people praise http://www.news.individual.net/ which is a free news server. I've never used it, and believe that it's only for text newsgroups, but then that shouldn't be a problem for newsgroups such as this. I found this in a message saved last March, but I know nothing about aioe.org, nor whether it still exists.
Are you talking to me ASAAR? I never mentioned anything about aioe.org. I've used google groups before, but I don't like that split screen and cluttered look they have. It was set up much better when it was Deja News years ago before google took it over..
asMy next effort will be to try using an open public NNTP server, suchso Iaioe.org. Seems to work okay from the dial-up connection to my ISP,can't envision any reason why it won't work from a WiFi connection, although I haven't yet given it a real-world test.
aioe.org carries 27,000 NGs, which covers everything I need.
That paragraph above is not mine. Were you trying to kill two birds with one stone? :)
If I were you, I'd try setting up a newsreader to test news.individual.net, as it's supposed to be dependable and have good message completion. You might find some other free "public" news servers if you search for them using Google.
I'll check news.individual.net.
tryingI finally got Read only and the error message I was getting when(Ito edit jpgs solved. I uninstalled and reinstalled Irfanview 3.80troublewanted to use that version as that was the version I was havingdidwith) -When I reinstalled Irfanview, I didn't get that error that IMostbefore about "unable to open file to write" or something similar.jpgs have Archive under Attributes, but a few still have Read only. Under what circumstances should jpgs have "Read only" and "archive".Those status bits are independent. Files should in general always have the Archive bit set. That bit is normally only changed by backup programs. It's used to identify files that probably need to be backed up, or "archived". It's generally "unset" for full backups, and the backup programs can then allow you to do a much quicker backup by only backing up files which would have that bit set. These would be new files, or files that had been edited since the last full backup. The ReadOnly bit of JPG files is generally not set. The most common cause for files (of any type) to have the R/O bit set is if they were copied from a source where they already had those bits set, such as from a CD or DVD. There are several other possibilities, but as I use none of them, they're just guesses. If you don't copy files directly from a card reader, but use a camera manufacturer's software to retrieve photos, it may "protect" the original copies by setting the R/O bit. Files transferred directly from the camera's USB port to the computer might have R/O bits set, depending on the design of the camera or its driver software.
Thanks for the explanation. I copy files from a card reader not from the camera. But that brings me to another question. When I first got the camera I transferred files from the USB port to the computer. That was internal memory before I got a memory card. But now I use a memory card reader, and copy the files to the computer from it. But if I didn't have a memory card reader, how would I transfer files from the memory card to the computer? If I did it by leaving the memory card in my camera and did USB to computer, how would the computer know if it was files to be transferred from the memory card or from the internal memory ?
Cathy
-- Ron Hunter rphunter@xxxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: Cathy
- Re: Irfanview question
- References:
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: Cathy
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: ASAAR
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: Cathy
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: ASAAR
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: Cathy
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: ASAAR
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: Cathy
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: ASAAR
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: Cathy
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: ASAAR
- Re: Irfanview question
- From: Cathy
- Re: Irfanview question
- Prev by Date: Re: Irfanview question
- Next by Date: Re: Irfanview question
- Previous by thread: Re: Irfanview question
- Next by thread: Re: Irfanview question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|