Re: THE LAND WHERE TIME STANDS STILL !!!
- From: airsmoothed@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 Oct 2005 05:59:26 -0700
[BnH] wrote:
> "Annika1980" <annika1980@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1128601416.768775.272360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >I was scanning some 50-year old slides for a friend of mine this week
> > and I decided to go out and re-take one of them.
> >
> > So here are two photos of the same area, taken over 50 years apart.
> > http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/50347255
> >
> > Ironically, my friend was about my age when he took the top pic.
> > He turns 95 in two weeks. I look forward to taking the same pic in
> > another 50 years. Maybe I'll have that digital scanning back by then.
> >
>
> Are you sure you did not paste it upside down ?
> The top ones looks like a much better image.
> The bottom ones has more dull colour,. typical on aging emulsions.
I thought that, but the tree growth seems more mature in the lower
shot, particularly over the rocky outcrop near the middle.
.
- References:
- THE LAND WHERE TIME STANDS STILL !!!
- From: Annika1980
- Re: THE LAND WHERE TIME STANDS STILL !!!
- From: [BnH]
- THE LAND WHERE TIME STANDS STILL !!!
- Prev by Date: Re: THE LAND WHERE TIME STANDS STILL !!!
- Next by Date: Re: Pentaprism v. pentamirror for manual focus lenses
- Previous by thread: Re: THE LAND WHERE TIME STANDS STILL !!!
- Next by thread: Re: THE LAND WHERE TIME STANDS STILL !!!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
