Re: One second discrepancy?
- From: "Bob Harrington" <rch.NOS-PAM@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 00:06:19 -0700
Terry Pinnell wrote:
> Although not exactly keeping me away at night, I'm puzzled by a tiny
> difference in the data for a batch of recent photos. Here's an
> example:
>
> Filename, created using Bulk Rename Utility, specifying 'Time Taken':
> J:\My Pictures\PHOTOS\Arabba 2005\Edit1\20050724-080105-Arabba.JPG
>
> From IrfanView EXIF info:
> DateTime 2005:07:24 08:01:05
> DateTimeOriginal 2005:07:24 08:01:05
> DateTimeDigitized 2005:07:24 08:01:05
>
> From IrfanView Image Properties:
> File date/time: 24/07/2005 / 08:01:04
> (And that is also displayed on status bar)
>
> From Windows Explorer:
> Created: Sun 2 October 2005, 16:53:06
> Modified: Sun 24 July 2005, 08:01:04
> Accessed: Sun 2 October 2005, 16:53:06
>
> Leave aside the issue of Windows Explorer's misleading use of the
> label 'Created'. But why is Modified ever 1 second *before* the time a
> photo was taken? I'm guessing that EXIF records decimals of a second
> and that this is just some sort of rounding consequence?
Daylight Wasting Time? ;^)
.
- References:
- One second discrepancy?
- From: Terry Pinnell
- One second discrepancy?
- Prev by Date: Re: Slow 5D sales?
- Next by Date: Re: Camera for computer-naive parents?
- Previous by thread: One second discrepancy?
- Next by thread: Re: One second discrepancy?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
