Re: NiMH again
- From: imbsysop <imbsysop@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 09:29:03 +0200
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005 04:56:48 +0000 (UTC), "Glittery Gary"
<OnThe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>"Nostrobino" <not@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>news:xsidnQ-UneXgbYDeRVn-qQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Kit" <kit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:431ddb77_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Nostrobino wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Somewhere I'd read that 1.0 V was the "specified voltage" at which a
>>>> cell
>>>> was considered discharged and should not be drained further. Too long
>>>> ago
>>>> for me to remember the details or source, though.
>>>>
>>>> N.
>>>
>>> Well if I could find that source, and consider it authoritative, then I
>>> could get a life again :-)
>>
>> :-)
>>
>> And I can't begin to remember. Just tried couple of Google searches and
>> haven't yet come up with anything useful.
>>
>> N.
>>
>
>yyaawwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
>
djeez .. your main goal in life must be dislockating yr jaw ..
...unless you're suffering from CFS ..
.
- References:
- NiMH again
- From: Kit
- Re: NiMH again
- From: Nostrobino
- Re: NiMH again
- From: Kit
- Re: NiMH again
- From: Nostrobino
- NiMH again
- Prev by Date: Re: NimH batteries
- Next by Date: Re: OT Hurricane
- Previous by thread: Re: NiMH again
- Next by thread: Scanning Workshop
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|