Re: Digital printing come full circle back to best and easiest done by printing pros ?



On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 00:18:50 GMT, Charles <ckraft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 22:30:44 GMT, Veronica <Veronica4-no spam@xxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>>Over the years it was the common norm to bring one's film to a
>>developer / printer. Black and White was more do-able in the garage or
>>basement, but color was challenging to the point of being practical
>>and cost effective to just drop off and pick up.
>>Then digital scanning came into technical workability at home. And few
>>service bureaus or print locations had other than a high end esoteric
>>Iris type printer. Thus the cottage industry of at home color printing
>>on Epson printers etc.
>>The 3rd party inks and papers industry flourished.
>>Now it may be that the printing services have come full circle and are
>>offering printing of digital files on a full gamut of printing devices
>>and the cost per print has come way down. Even Costco lets you
>>electronically send in your finished files and one only has to pick
>>them up.
>>Likewise with service bureaus. Only the pick up.
>>The question / point is :
>>Has the cost purchasing and the trouble of maintaining ones own inkjet
>>printer, become actually less cost effective and more bother than
>>using dedicated print services (who have now fully adapted to digital
>>files) ?
>>
>>One can now do all the digital dark rooming that one needs to in
>>Photoshop and present a finished file that should look quite as it
>>would on one's screen or own printer output. In the older days of
>>film, one was left at the mercy of the judgment dark rooming of the
>>developer / printer.
>>
>>I have not done all the math, but particularly in major cities, where
>>the printers keep stocks of various art papers - (and have such
>>continuous use of their own printers that clogged nozzles is never a
>>grave concern) -
>>
>>Might it be sensible to give up the hassles and lifespan of ink jet
>>printers and return to the former model of having dedicated
>>professionals do the printing and just run down and pick up the prints
>>the next day or the same day ?
>>
>>My spouse and I co-wrote this and will present it to groups of
>>interest.
>>We do welcome responses.
>
>For me, photography is recreational, sometimes a means to an end,
>sometimes just the end in itself. Printing is part of the recreation.
>
>I did color printing in a closet, wet side in the kitchen. that was
>recreational as well.

Thanks for your responses. I, the spouse and I, have printed with some
9 iterations of evolving Epson inkjet printers.
I was coming to the conclusion that the capacities, at least in the
color printing world, and with the very significant fact that digital
files can be finalized in the designated color space (adobe RGB, SRGB,
etc.). Then what should come out the other end of a color print, in a
service bureau, should be so, so much more uniform and predictable
than 5 years ago, even, in the digital inkjet world.
Back in the days of color film printing, which I would not consider
doing myself, one could or would have to bring the print back for a
redo, but today the digital darkroom has given printers a pretty much
ready to go "do it this way" file, that would seem to be just needed
to be spit out by an Epson 9600 or Fuji Frontier or, which can't be
done at home, a "C" print on long used and accepted traditional
photographic paper.
I am trying to see if firing up an Epson 2200, as yet unused and
returnable, is really worth it any more, particularly since I live in
a large city with pro printers all over the place competing for my
business.
I am not asking anyone else to decide my life for me, but your
responses are, indeed, valuable.
Please continue to any other responses.
(my spouse and I are co creating the threads)
V.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Locking linked Word documents
    ... printing" under Tools/Options/Print to control this issue. ... > The slides aren't given to the printing company - only the document. ... The Word doc will prompt to ask if you want to update the ... the commercial printers could print ...
    (microsoft.public.office.misc)
  • Re: Access 97 vs Later Version
    ... are off-topic and there are printing newsgroups. ... Accept that as a limitation of Windows or Printers, then you can move on to ... No-one reasonably uses dot matrix nowadays so ... > There is an official report. ...
    (microsoft.public.access.devtoolkits)
  • Comparing different models
    ... Recto-verso printing will be rarely used, since the photocopier's recto-verso can be used instead. ... BTW, last time I carefully dived into devices specs, world was divided between ink jet printers with a printing resolution roughly equal to 300 dpi, and laser printers with a printing resolution going from 600 to 1200 dpi for the most expansive models. ...
    (comp.periphs.printers)
  • Re: Lexmark Inkjets and TS
    ... Some day we may indeed have to go with one of the third pary printing ... Microsoft should really solve this ... > printers are harder and harder to find. ... > The best compatibity list is here: ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)
  • Re: Lexmark Inkjets and TS
    ... Printing has always been a sore spot with server based computing, ... The cost of one of these ... Generally HP LaserJet 4xxx series printers are the most compatible, ... Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.terminal_services)