Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: "Nostrobino" <not@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:55:51 -0400
"Mr. Mark" <e.cartman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6INMe.36012$dJ5.15748@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Depends on your intentions. If you are trying to trick millions of
>> > Americans into believing there are WMD in a small country in the Middle
>> > East
>>
>> Oh, good grief.
>>
>> Talk about dragging your political agenda in by the left hind foot . . .
>
> Not at all. I'm pro war. Just don't think we need to make up excuses to
> invade evil countries. That they are evil should be reason enough.
But you think someone (presumably the Bush administration) was "trying to
trick millions of Americans into believing there are WMD in a small country
in the Middle East"? Which means you think Bush et al. never really believed
that there were any such weapons. It's not the fault of bad intelligence or
anything like that, but a deliberate lie to the American people? You're in
the camp that claims to actually believe that, and promotes it as an honest
assessment?
N.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: Mr. Mark
- Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- References:
- When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: Mike Warren
- Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: Celcius
- Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: Mike Warren
- Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: Mr. Mark
- Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: Nostrobino
- Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- From: Mr. Mark
- When is a photograph not a photograph
- Prev by Date: Re: iPhoto RAW deal
- Next by Date: Re: dSLR and dust
- Previous by thread: Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- Next by thread: Re: When is a photograph not a photograph
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading