Re: Photo with photo's?

Then your name would be shortened to Hobb's.
The apostrophy denotes possession as in the rather clumsy sentence - We
did not know the photo's subject.
plural is NEVER denote by an apstrophy. Were you a fan of The Beatle's?
or the Rolling Stone's? Did you go to the lot to look at used car's? Was
your last ice cream cone two scoop's? Nope. Nope Nope. Nope Nope Nope.


--
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com
home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto
The Improved Links Pages are at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html
A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at
http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html

"Tim Hobbs" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4i6le1tn2s8a2v2dv1vb9hsjgq3op8ohf6@xxxxxxxxxx
> >Lots. And by the way, the plural of "photo" is ALWAYS "photos" (no
> >apostrophe), reglardless of the context
> >
> >
>
> "Photo's" is perfectly valid - the apostrophe denotes the missing
> letters in the word "photograph".
>
>
> --
>
> Tim Hobbs
>
> '58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
> '77 101FC Ambulance aka "Burrt"
> '03 Volvo V70


.