Re: Photo with photo's?

From: Tim Hobbs <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 22:07:38 +0100

>Lots. And by the way, the plural of "photo" is ALWAYS "photos" (no
>apostrophe), reglardless of the context
>
>

"Photo's" is perfectly valid - the apostrophe denotes the missing
letters in the word "photograph".

--

Tim Hobbs

'58 Series 2 88" aka "Stig"
'77 101FC Ambulance aka "Burrt"
'03 Volvo V70
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Photo with photo's?
  - From: Bill Funk
- Re: Photo with photo's?
  - From: Tony
- Re: Photo with photo's?
  - From: Frank ess

Prev by Date: Re: Why can't a non-SLR have equivalent quality?
Next by Date: Re: Photo with photo's?
Previous by thread: Another question about digital zoom (in video mode lossless zoom possible?)
Next by thread: Re: Photo with photo's?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: SLR choices
... buying decision is being made based on max megapixels, ... Tim Hobbs ... '03 Volvo V70 ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.photo.digital)
Re: SLR choices
... Why do you want>8 megapixels? ... Tim Hobbs ... '03 Volvo V70 ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.photo.digital)
Re: New lens anyone?
... So far, nowt... ... Tim Hobbs ... '03 Volvo V70 ... Prev by Date: ...
(rec.photo.digital)