Re: Canon 350D clearly beats Nikon D50 at dpreview.com
- From: "Darrell" <spam@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:43:37 -0400
"Larry" <larrylynch3rd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MPG.1d4d89d4689280b498968c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> I dont see any point whatever in comparing 8mp cameras to 6mp cameras at
> all.
>
> If you are shopping for picture QUALITY you should be comparing apples to
> apples, not apples to larger fruit.
>
> The fact that an 8mp image is bigger than a 6mp image is
> incontrovertable,,
> the better image is subjective (within limits).
>
Yup the XT is 447 pixels longer than the original rebel. The Noritsu 2901
(and others) minilab use 400 dpi for photo quality. So that 12.7% increase
means a 1" (one inch) bigger print. Better wow 12.7% better, not even
noticable
I agree with you that many seem more concerned with pixel count, perhaps
Canon & Nikon should paint their huge lenses red. I wonder what Desmond
Morris would read into that.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Why can't a non-SLR have equivalent quality?
- Next by Date: Re: Beware Special Offers from Nikon and Epson
- Previous by thread: Re: Canon 350D clearly beats Nikon D50 at dpreview.com
- Next by thread: Re: Canon 350D clearly beats Nikon D50 at dpreview.com
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
