Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- From: "Trevor" <trevor@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:18:15 +1000
"Frank S" <fsheffi1@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uNKdnVHJHtQGzQrSnZ2dnUVZ_ridnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
}Why would 180° be a limit?
Two camera's back to back give you 360deg, how much more do you need?
Seems to me they might give you a 360-degree view but would miss a slice
of the actual scene the width of the distance between front elements?
True enough, but it seems the demand for any more at exponentially
increasing prices, seems to be *very* limited. I can't say I'm surprised.
Trevor.
.
- References:
- Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- From: Me
- Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- From: R. Mark Clayton
- Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- From: Trevor
- Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- From: Alan Browne
- Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- From: Trevor
- Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- From: Frank S
- Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- Prev by Date: Canon 5D Mark III and Nikon D800 Review - By Fred Miranda
- Next by Date: Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- Previous by thread: Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- Next by thread: Re: Nikon 6mm = $140,000?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|